4.3 Review

Increased incidence of spontaneous abortions on exposure to cadmium and lead: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 16-21

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2021.1942450

关键词

Cadmium (Cd); lead (Pb); spontaneous abortions; toxicity; systematic review; meta-analysis

资金

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi [2020-9200]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the role of cadmium and lead in causing spontaneous abortions. The results indicated that populations exposed to heavy metals like cadmium and lead are at higher risk of experiencing pregnancy loss.
Background Spontaneous abortions are the most severe complication of early pregnancy and are a major reproductive health problem. Although this could be caused due to various cytogenetic, immunological, or endocrinological reasons, role of environmental toxicants cannot be ruled out. In order to explore the role of cadmium and lead in causing spontaneous abortions, current systematic review and meta-analysis had been carried out. Methodology Literature search was performed using appropriate keywords in PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases up to December 25 2020 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PRISMA). Metananalysis was carried out with the help of RevMan software (version 5.3). Results Meta-analysis of nine studies on cadmium concentrations in blood of women with at least one spontaneous abortions and controls revealed standardized mean difference (SMD)=3.39, 95% CI (2.17, 4.61), with p < .05. Similarly, meta-analysis of eight studies on lead concentrations revealed standardized mean difference (SMD)=6.24, 95% CI (4.34, 8.14), with p < .05. Conclusion Populations exposed to heavy metals such as cadmium and lead are at higher risk of pregnancy loss. Therefore, couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses may be screened for heavy metal load.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据