4.4 Article

Pricing Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Under Disruptions

期刊

FILOMAT
卷 30, 期 15, 页码 4059-4072

出版社

UNIV NIS, FAC SCI MATH
DOI: 10.2298/FIL1615059X

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2015GQ006]
  2. Natural Science Foundation [71402038]
  3. Higher education development fund of Liaoning Province [20110116202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this paper is to understand how disruptions effect on closed-loop supply chain, and how to achieve the coordination of closed-loop supply chain under disruptions situation for the whole supply chain system. Design /methodology/approach- This paper analyzed the effect caused by the disruptions of the closed-loop supply chain from both supply and demand, and applied the established margin profits sharing contract to achieve coordination under the disruptions. Findings-From both supply side and demand side, it drew how the disruptions affect the closed-loop supply chain. When the disruptions have less effect on the forward and reverse cost of closed-loop supply chain, the impact of the closed-loop supply chain is controllable; when the disruptions have lager effect on the forward and reverse cost of closed-loop supply chain, the impact of the closed-loop supply chain is uncontrollable. Research limitations/implications- In this paper, the contract costs are ignored for zero. While in actual situation, to maintain the efficient implementation of this contract must spend considerable cost. Sometimes the cost may be too high to become hinder between manufacturers and retailers. This paper also does not make in-depth study on this issue, so it will be further study in the future. Originality/value- This paper also designed a set of differential profit sharing contract based on revenue sharing contract mechanism. The contract is easy to be managed, easy to be operated, making the closedloop supply chain system can achieve coordination whether in steady state or under disruptions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据