4.7 Article

Socioeconomics effects on global hotspots of common debris items on land and the seafloor

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102360

关键词

Infrastructure; Marine debris; Mismanaged waste; Policy; Plastic pollution; Population

资金

  1. CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere
  2. Ocean Conservancy
  3. PADI AWARE Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of socioeconomic and geographic factors on coastal environment pollution by anthropogenic debris, finding hotspots of different debris items across the globe. Debris counts generally increased with the value of infrastructure and decreased with national wealth in different countries.
Pollution of coastal environments by anthropogenic debris is a global problem that is increasingly in the public eye. We evaluated the influence of socioeconomic and geographic factors on common debris items at a global scale. We compared debris density and socioeconomic drivers of the ten most common items reported on land and the seafloor, analyzing data from 22,508 land-based and 7,290 seafloor clean-ups and surveys across 116 and 118 countries, respectively. We found debris hotspots for different items span numerous countries across all continents. This demonstrates that the debris problem is global and heterogeneous, pointing to the transboundary nature of the issue and necessitating sub-national approaches to implementing effective solutions. Food and beverage packaging items, predominantly made from single-use plastics, accounted for much of the debris. Hotspots of individual debris items were differentially driven by socioeconomic factors. In general, total debris counts increased with the value of infrastructure, and decreased with national wealth. Highly polluted sites occurred in high-infrastructure, low-wealth locations such as Athens, Greece; Tunis, Tunisia and Lima, Peru. Based on these findings, we identify specific opportunities for policy makers and citizens alike to focus efforts aimed at reducing debris entering the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据