4.7 Article

How is organic farming performing agronomically and economically in sub-Saharan Africa?

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102325

关键词

Productivity; Profitability; Smallholder farmer; Impact assessment; Agroecology

资金

  1. Mercator Foundation Switzerland
  2. Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation
  3. HIVOS
  4. Gerling Foundation
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential of organic agriculture and agroecological approaches in improving food security in Africa remains controversial in global discussions. Studies conducted in Ghana and Kenya show varying levels of adoption of organic agriculture principles and a preference for passive rather than active organic management among farmers. While yields and gross margins under organic management in four of the case studies remain similar to conventional values, one case study showed significant increases in yields and profits. Overall, organically managed farms showed significantly higher farm-level gross margins compared to conventional farms, indicating the potential benefits of organic and agroecological approaches when implemented effectively.
The potential of organic agriculture and agroecological approaches for improving food security in Africa is a controversial topic in global discussions. While there is a number of meta-analyses on the environmental, agronomic and financial performance of organic farming, most of the underlying data stems from on-station field trials from temperate regions. Data from sub-Sahara Africa in particular, as well as detailed real-farm data is scarce. How organic farming is implemented in sub-Saharan Africa and how it performs in a smallholder context remains poorly understood. We applied a novel observational two-factorial research design, which allowed to evaluate the impacts of i) interventions for introducing organic agriculture and ii) specific organic management practices on 1,645 farms from five case studies in Ghana and Kenya, which we closely monitored for 24 months. Among the farmers who have been exposed to the interventions, we found heterogeneous adoption of organic agriculture principles, depending on the intervention. Furthermore, we found rather passive than active organic management among farmers. Most yields and gross margins under organic management remained at similar levels as the conventional values in four of the case studies. In one case study, however, coffee, maize and macadamia nut yields increased by 127-308% and farm-level gross margins over all analysed crops by 292%. Pooling our data across all case studies, we found significantly higher (+144%) farm-level gross margins on organically managed farms than on conventional farms. This indicates the potential of organic and agroecological approaches if implemented well. Based on our observations, we argue for improving the implementation of organic agriculture projects in settings with smallholder farmers. Limited capacities, lack of appropriate inputs and market access are major agronomic and institutional challenges to be addressed. Furthermore, we argue for supporting a differentiated debate about which types of organic farming are really desirable by classifying approaches to organic farming according to i) their intention to work organically and ii) the degree of following the organic principles. This will support the design and implementation of targeted policy interventions for stimulating sustainability of farming systems and rural development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据