4.7 Article

Why are carbon taxes unfair? Disentangling public perceptions of fairness

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Article Environmental Studies

Why hate carbon taxes? Machine learning evidence on the roles of personal responsibility, trust, revenue recycling, and other factors across 23 European countries

Sebastian Levi

Summary: Research shows that a sense of personal responsibility for combating climate change is a key factor in predicting opposition to carbon taxes and attitudes towards other climate policies. Political trust plays an important role in predicting opposition to carbon taxes, while returning carbon tax revenues back to households only leads to minor increases in public support for higher carbon taxes.

ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE (2021)

Article Environmental Sciences

Public views on carbon taxation and its fairness: a computational-linguistics analysis

Ivan Savin et al.

CLIMATIC CHANGE (2020)

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

How to win public support for a global carbon tax

Stefano Carattini et al.

NATURE (2019)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

stm: An R Package for Structural Topic Models

Margaret E. Roberts et al.

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2019)

Review Environmental Studies

Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature

Sara Maestre-Andres et al.

CLIMATE POLICY (2019)

Review Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Policy design for the Anthropocene

Thomas Sterner et al.

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY (2019)

Article Development Studies

Environmental management from left to right - on ideology, policy-specific beliefs and pro-environmental policy support

Sverker C. Jagers et al.

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT (2018)

Article Environmental Sciences

Citizens' preferences for tackling climate change. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of their freely formulated solutions

Endre Tvinnereim et al.

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2017)

Article Environmental Studies

Up and down with climate politics 2013-2016: the repeal of carbon pricing in Australia

Kate Crowley

WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE (2017)

Article Environmental Sciences

Explaining topic prevalence in answers to open-ended survey questions about climate change

Endre Tvinnereim et al.

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE (2015)

Article Political Science

Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses

Margaret E. Roberts et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2014)

Article Economics

Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students

Junghwa Kim et al.

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE (2013)

Article Political Science

A Tale of Two Taxes: The Fate of Environmental Tax Reform in Canada

Kathryn Harrison

REVIEW OF POLICY RESEARCH (2012)

Article Ecology

The demand for earmarking: Results from a focus group study

Steffen Kallbekken et al.

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS (2010)

Article Environmental Sciences

Understanding US public support for domestic climate change policies

Rachael Shwom et al.

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS (2010)

Article Economics

Fair Air: Distributive Justice and Environmental Economics

Olof Johansson-Stenman et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS (2010)

Article Environmental Studies

Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness

Louise Eriksson et al.

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY (2006)

Article Sociology

A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications

Shalom Schwartz

COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY (2006)

Article Ecology

Are CO2 taxes regressive?: Evidence from the Danish experience

M Wier et al.

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS (2005)

Article Economics

Carbon tax simulations using a household demand model

R Brännlund et al.

EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (2004)

Article Sociology

Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values

R Inglehart et al.

AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW (2000)