4.7 Article

Why are carbon taxes unfair? Disentangling public perceptions of fairness

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102356

关键词

Carbon dioxide tax; Fairness; Justice; Public opinion

资金

  1. Center for Collective Action Research at the University of Gothenburg
  2. Laboratory of Opinion Research at the University of Gothenburg
  3. Swedish Research Council [2018-05973]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Governments need voter support for policy interventions like carbon taxes to reach climate goals. Previous research shows that people perceive carbon taxes as unfair due to high gas prices, unfairness for the poor and rural population, lack of trust in government, and perceptions of unjustified tax purposes.
In order to reach climate goals, governments need to gain support from their voters for the necessary policy interventions, such as carbon dioxide taxes. Previous research concludes that people often do not support and legitimize such taxes because they perceive them as unfair. However, the notion of fairness implies a multitude of factors and despite attempts of the previous research to further nuance people's fairness perceptions, we currently lack a more precise understanding of what people mean when they regard carbon taxes as unfair. In this article, we thoroughly investigate this problem by using original survey data from YouGov collected in the United States in 2018 and analyzing open-ended survey responses on why people think carbon taxes are unfair. Applying structural topic modeling, we unpack the multi-dimensional meaning of unfairness, as perceived by the US population. The results from our analysis show that people regard carbon taxes based on gas pricing as unfair because they perceive gas prices already being high, because of the need to drive, unfairness for the poor or rural population, lack of trust in government, or considerations that the purpose of the tax is unjustified. These findings help provide a more nuanced policy design to address fairness concerns related to carbon taxes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据