4.8 Article

Vegetation responses to climate extremes recorded by remotely sensed atmospheric formaldehyde

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 1809-1822

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15880

关键词

atmospheric remote sensing; climate extremes; formaldehyde; photosynthesis; stress; vegetation; volatile organic compounds

资金

  1. European Research Council [787203]
  2. Belgian Federal Science Policy Office
  3. Belgian Research Action
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [787203] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the rapid protective response of plants to stress through the emission of short-lived biogenic volatile organic compounds, which is reflected as the largest positive HCHO anomalies in remote sensing data, particularly evident in forested regions.
Accurate monitoring of vegetation stress is required for better modelling and forecasting of primary production, in a world where heatwaves and droughts are expected to become increasingly prevalent. Variability in formaldehyde (HCHO) concentrations in the troposphere is dominated by local emissions of short-lived biogenic (BVOC) and pyrogenic volatile organic compounds. BVOCs are emitted by plants in a rapid protective response to abiotic stress, mediated by the energetic status of leaves (the excess of reducing power when photosynthetic light and dark reactions are decoupled, as occurs when stomata close in response to water stress). Emissions also increase exponentially with leaf temperature. New analytical methods for the detection of spatiotemporally contiguous extremes in remote-sensing data are applied here to satellite-derived atmospheric HCHO columns. BVOC emissions are shown to play a central role in the formation of the largest positive HCHO anomalies. Although vegetation stress can be captured by various remotely sensed quantities, spaceborne HCHO emerges as the most consistent recorder of vegetation responses to the largest climate extremes, especially in forested regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据