4.6 Article

Water exchange across a subgrade-GCL interface as impacted by polymers and environmental conditions

期刊

GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 40-54

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.08.005

关键词

Geosynthetics; GCLs; Polymers; Hydration; Temperatures

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP190103682]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the hydration behaviour of polymer enhanced geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) under isothermal and diurnal cyclical temperatures at a Melbourne landfill site. It was found that diurnal temperature cycling suppressed GCL hydration, limiting it to vapour phase hydration. The study also highlights the impact of temperature on GCL hydration in Mediterranean type climate.
This paper examines the hydration behaviour of polymer enhanced geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) under both isothermal conditions and diurnal cyclical temperatures as recorded at a Melbourne landfill site. The diurnal temperature cycles introduced thermal gradients, which induced water movement downwards into the subgrade. It was found that the bulk of the thermal and hydraulic effects occurred within the upper 50 mm of the subgrade layer. Compared to isothermal conditions, diurnal temperature cycling's main effect was to suppress GCL hy-dration. Thermal gradients induced capillary breaks, and GCL hydration was thus limited to vapour phase hy-dration from the subgrade, which restricted the gravimetric water content of the GCLs to <30%. The hydration process at the interface was observed to gradually return to isothermal condition hydration levels once the temperature cycle conditions were removed. While the polymer's presence ensures the adsorption of more water, it also renders GCLs more sensitive to the effects of temperature. This study provides insights on the hydration behaviour of uncovered GCLs in field applications and the impact that diurnal temperature cycles can have on GCL hydration in a Mediterranean type climate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据