4.7 Article

Revisiting AMOC Transport Estimates From Observations and Models

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 48, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL093045

关键词

Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC); evaluation of transport methods in models | level‐ of‐ no‐ motion and reference velocity; MOVE and RAPID transport estimates

资金

  1. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Climate Program Office (CPO), Climate Variability and Predictability Program [NA18OAR4310429]
  2. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Modeling Analysis, Predictions, and Projections Program [NA18OAR4310429]
  3. NOAA Global Ocean Monitoring and Observing (GOMO) Program
  4. Department of Energy, Earth and Environmental System Modeling, Regional and Global Model Analysis Program
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  6. National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) - NSF [1852977]
  7. UK Natural Environment Research Council for the RAPID-AMOC program
  8. NSF [1332978]
  9. NOAA CPO [100007298]
  10. NOAA GOMO Program [NA20OAR4320278]
  11. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  12. Directorate For Geosciences [1332978] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revisited the reference level assumptions used to calculate the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation transports, finding substantial differences among the transport estimates obtained with various methods at different observation sites. Methods properly accounting for reference velocities in the model at MOVE produce transports that are in good agreement with the model truth.
Reference level assumptions used to calculate the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation transports at the RAPID and Meridional Overturning Variability Experiment (MOVE) observing arrays are revisited in an eddying ocean model. Observational transport calculation methods are complemented by several alternative approaches. At RAPID, the model transports from the observational method and the model truth (based on the actual model velocities) agree well in their mean and variability. There are substantial differences among the transport estimates obtained with various methods at the MOVE site. These differences result from relatively large and time-varying reference velocities at depth in the model, not supporting a level-of-no-motion. The methods that account for these reference velocities properly at MOVE produce transports that are in good agreement with the model truth. In contrast with the observational estimates, the model transport trends at MOVE and RAPID largely agree with each other on pentadal to multi-decadal time scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据