4.7 Article

On Contributions of Multiscale Dynamic Processes to the Steric Height in the Northeastern South China Sea as Revealed by Moored Observations

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 48, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL093829

关键词

steric height; mesoscale eddies; submesoscales; internal gravity waves; SWOT

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [42076004, 41706005, 91958205, 91858203]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China (NRDP) [2018YFA0605702, 2016YFC1402605]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [202041009, 201861006, 202013028]
  4. NSFC [41622601, 91858201]
  5. NRDP [2016YFC1401404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on 2-year moored measurements in the northeastern South China Sea, this study quantified the contributions of multiscale dynamic processes to steric height at 60 m. The analysis showed that different dynamic processes have different relative contributions to steric height, and their effects vary seasonally.
Based on 2-year moored measurements in the northeastern South China Sea, contributions of multiscale dynamic processes to steric height (SH) at 60 m are quantified. It shows that on average, root-mean-squared (RMS) SHs of mesoscales, submesoscales, diurnal and semidiurnal internal tides (ITs), and supertidal internal gravity waves (IGWs) are 7.56, 1.01, 1.19, 2.84, and 1.46 cm, respectively, with their respective relative contributions of 53.8%, 7.2%, 8.5%, 20.2%, and 10.4%. The SHs of ITs and supertidal IGWs are dominated by stationary and nonstationary components, respectively. Seasonally, mesoscales and submesoscales show larger RMS SHs in winter than summer but the opposite occurs for ITs and supertidal IGWs. Although the RMS SH of submesoscales exceeds nonstationary ITs in winter, it is much smaller than the sum of nonstationary ITs and supertidal IGWs. Therefore, to detect submesoscales using SWOT data, approaches to remove the SHs of nonstationary ITs and supertidal IGWs are called for.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据