4.6 Article

Interseismic deformation in the Gulf of Aqaba from GPS measurements

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 228, 期 1, 页码 477-492

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggab353

关键词

Plate motions; Space geodetic surveys; Transient deformation; Continental tectonics; strike-slip and transform; Neotectonics

资金

  1. KAUST [OSR-2016-CRG5-3027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a new GPS velocity field to investigate the recent seismic dynamics of the southernmost part of the Gulf of Aqaba, revealing a decreasing locking depth from inland towards the southern junction with the Red Sea rift, along with a small systematic left-lateral residual motion. Additionally, estimates suggest elevated seismic hazard in the Gulf area, implying possible end of current interseismic period on main faults.
Although the Dead Sea Transform (DST) fault system has been extensively studied in the past, little has been known about the present-day kinematics of its southernmost portion that is offshore in the Gulf of Aqaba. Here, we present a new GPS velocity field based on three surveys conducted between 2015 and 2019 at 30 campaign sites, complemented by 11 permanent stations operating near the gulf coast. Interseismic models of strain accumulation indicate a slip rate of 4.9(-0.6)(+0.9) mm yr(-1) and a locking depth of 6.8(-3.1)(+3.5) km in the gulf's northern region. Our results further indicate an apparent reduction of the locking depth from the inland portion of the DST towards its southern junction with the Red Sea rift. Our modelling results reveal a small systematic left-lateral residual motion that we postulate is caused by, at least in part, late post-seismic transient motion from the 1995 M-W 7.2 Nuweiba earthquake. Estimates of the moment accumulation rate on the main faults in the gulf, other than the one that ruptured in 1995, suggest that they might be near the end of their current interseismic period, implying elevated seismic hazard in the gulf area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据