4.2 Article

Production of therapeutic iduronate-2-sulfatase enzyme with a novel single-stranded RNA virus vector

期刊

GENES TO CELLS
卷 26, 期 11, 页码 891-904

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gtc.12894

关键词

gene therapy; iduronate-2-sulfatase; lysosomal storage disorder; mucopolysaccharidosis; RNA virus vector; sendai virus

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [19K07952]
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [20ek0110009h0123]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K07952] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel Sendai virus vector shows potential for therapeutic use in treating lysosomal storage disorders, demonstrating high efficiency in gene expression and protein production.
The Sendai virus vector has received a lot of attention due to its broad tropism for mammalian cells. As a result of efforts for genetic studies based on a mutant virus, we can now express more than 10 genes of up to 13.5 kilo nucleotides in a single vector with high protein expression efficiency. To prove this benefit, we examined the efficacy of the novel ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus vector harboring the human iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS) gene with 1,653 base pairs, a causative gene for mucopolysaccharidosis type II, also known as a disorder of lysosomal storage disorders. As expected, this novel RNA vector with the human IDS gene exhibited its marked expression as determined by the expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein and IDS enzyme activity. While these cells exhibited a normal growth rate, the BHK-21 transformant cells stably expressing the human IDS gene persistently generated an active human IDS enzyme extracellularly. The human IDS protein produced failed to be incorporated into the lysosome when cells were pretreated with mannose-6-phosphate, demonstrating that this human IDS enzyme has potential for therapeutic use by cross-correction. These results suggest that our novel RNA vector may be applicable for further clinical settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据