4.7 Article

Torrefaction of Short Rotation Coppice Willow. Characterization, hydrophobicity assessment and kinetics of the process

期刊

FUEL
卷 295, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120601

关键词

Torrefaction; Compositional analysis; Hydrophobicity; Py-GC; MS; Torrefaction kinetics

资金

  1. MINECO [MINECO-13-CTQ2013-45155-R]
  2. Consejeria de Economia y Empleo del Principado de Asturias [FC15GRUPIN14095]
  3. Severo Ochoa Program (Principado de Asturias, Spain)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Short Rotation Coppice Willow (SRCW) is a new source of renewable energy improved through torrefaction, which enhances hygroscopicity and heating value for use as fuel. The non-oxidative and oxidative torrefaction of SRCW were compared, with optimal temperature resulting in high mass and energy yields, reduced moisture content, and changes in elemental ratios. The biomass becomes hydrophobic with increased contact angle and decreased water absorption.
Short Rotation Coppice Willow (SRCW) is one of the newest sources of renewable energy. Torrefaction enhances the initial poorest characteristics of SRCW, such as hygroscopicity or low heating value compared to traditional fuels, to use it as a fuel. Non-oxidative and oxidative torrefaction of SRCW were compared. Torrefaction were conducted within the range 200?240 ?C and torrefied SRCW and released gases were characterized (proximate, ultimate, compositional and heating value analysis as well as hydrophobicity assessment, Py-GC/MS and chemical-kinetics parameters). At optimal torrefaction temperature, mass and energy yields were around 88% and 93%, respectively, moisture was reduced up to 1.22?1.28% and H/C and O/C atomic ratios up to 1.4 and 0.6, respectively. Biomass turns hydrophobic since contact angle increase and the amount of water absorb decrease in contact angle and liquid penetration studies, respectively. The global reaction order was 2 and kinetic constant values were in the range 4.6 10-5 s- 1?3.6 10-5 s- 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据