Bringing social values to wildlife conservation decisions

Humans regularly exert a powerful influence on the survival and persistence of species, yet social-science information is used only sporadically in conservation decisions. Using data obtained from a survey of 46,894 US residents, we developed and applied a spatially explicit sociocultural index to inform decision making through an understanding of public values toward wildlife. The classification is defined by opposing values of mutualism and domination, which have been previously shown to be highly predictive of attitudes on a wide range of policy issues. We developed state and county maps that can be used to represent public interests in policy decisions and inform management actions that target human behavior, such as education. To illustrate, we present findings indicating a supportive social context for gray wolf (Canis lupus) reintroduction in Colorado, an issue voted on and passed through a November 2020 citizen ballot initiative. Although the results are particularly relevant for the US, the technique is broadly applicable and its expansion is encouraged to better account for human factors in conservation decisions globally.

Automated summary

A socio-cultural index was developed based on a survey of US residents to inform decision making regarding public values towards wildlife. The opposing values of mutualism and domination were found to be highly predictive of societal attitudes. The technique, although initially developed for the US, is encouraged to be expanded globally to better account for human factors in conservation decisions.