4.5 Editorial Material

The risk of inter-stub contamination during SEM/EDS analysis of gunshot residue particles Comment

期刊

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
卷 323, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110756

关键词

GSR; Contamination; SEM/EDX

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The most common forensic method for detecting and characterizing gunshot residue (GSR) is currently the scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDX). Experiments have shown that the probability of transfer of GSR particles between stubs is very low, indicating that the risk of inter-stub contamination is highly negligible.
Detecting gunshot residue (GSR) particles on samples collected from individuals or their belongings can connect them to a shooting event. Scanning electron microscopy combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (SEM/EDX) is currently the most common forensic method for detecting and characterizing GSR. At the forensic laboratory of the Israel Police, one inch (25 mm) diameter sticky stubs are used to collect samples from suspects' hands, hair, clothes and vehicles. To maximize testing capacity, stubs of samples collected from several different cases and persons may be analyzed side by side in a single run. This has raised concern in court that a clean sample taken from an innocent person may be contaminated during the analysis by GSR particles from an adjacent sample transferred inside the SEM chamber. several experiments were conducted where stubs that were known to contain GSR particles were run adjacent to stubs that were known to be clean. Not a single event of GSR particle transfer was detected, even when a clean stub was surrounded on all sides by stubs containing a total of over 100,000 particles. Thus, the probability of transfer of a single particle is at most 1:100,000. Since the total number of GSR particles found per run is usually three orders of magnitude lower than 100,000, we conclude that the risk of inter-stub contamination is highly negligible. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据