4.4 Review

Biological activity and processing technologies of edible insects: a review

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 1003-1023

出版社

KOREAN SOCIETY FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-KOSFOST
DOI: 10.1007/s10068-021-00942-8

关键词

Edible insect; Biological activity; Processing technology; Food resources; Entomophagy

资金

  1. Korea Food Research Institute [E0211100-01]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [E0211100-01] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The review focused on the importance of edible insects as food sources, their nutritional value, biological activities, and applications in the food industry, emphasizing the need to improve extraction methods for successful incorporation of edible insects in food and pharmaceutical industries.
The burgeoning global population growth has raised concerns regarding the expected increase in the demand for food, which could be partially tackled by identifying novel food sources. To this end, edible insects have recently attracted research interest. Several technologies for utilizing edible insect-derived proteins have been introduced; however, research into their functional utilization is insufficient. Herein, we reviewed the relevant literature on the importance of insects as food sources, extraction of edible insects, the nutritional value of insects, biological activities of components, and their applications in food industries. We summarized the studies primarily focused on the functional utilization of edible insects, suggesting that for successful incorporation and growth of edible insects in food and pharmaceutical industries, strategies to improve the extraction methods are required to explore the biological activity of edible insects. Furthermore, the awareness of edible insects with a focus on their allergens warrants consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据