4.7 Article

3D printing of a high protein yoghurt-based gel: Effect of protein enrichment and gelatine on physical and sensory properties

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110517

关键词

3D food printing; Protein-enrichment; Yoghurt-based gel; Personalised nutrition; Rheological measurements; Texture profile analysis; Sensory evaluation; Multisensory layering

资金

  1. 3P - Personalised food Products for Patients - Innovation Fund Denmark [7045-00029B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the combination of gelatine and whey protein isolate can result in more stable and well-shaped 3D printed yoghurt gels.
The potential application of 3D printing technology in creating protein-rich desserts with multisensory design was investigated. Yoghurt-gel inks were formulated by varying the concentration of gelatine and whey protein isolate (WPI). Assessment of rheological and textural properties prior to printing, showed that an increase of gelatine concentration from 7.5 to 12.5% w/w increased the yield stress, storage modulus, loss modulus, firmness, and resilience of yoghurt gels. Addition of 12% WPI reduced these effects; creating softer gels with reduced resilience. However, these gels showed stable shape after printing, especially in formulations with higher gelatine concentrations. The changes in textural properties caused by the extrusion process need to be considered when designing yoghurt gels, as a significant reduction in firmness and resilience and an increase in adhesiveness were observed after 3D printing. The more stable and well-shaped 3D printed yoghurt gels were obtained by the combined effect of WPI and gelatine which provided a good balance of appearance, taste, flavour, and mouthfeel attributes evaluated by a trained sensory panel. A consumer study performed with thirty healthy adults showed the potential to improve sensory acceptance through the creation of multisensory layered design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据