4.7 Article

Enhancing the stability of oil-in-water emulsions by synergistic interplay between binary protein particles and starch nanocrystals

期刊

FOOD HYDROCOLLOIDS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107164

关键词

Biphasic stabilization; o; w emulsions; Irreversible adsorption; Binary proteins; Starch nanocrystals

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901602, 31778198]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20180614]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, binary protein particles with hydrophilic shells and hydrophobic cores were used as stabilizers for o/w emulsions, further reinforced by starch nanocrystals to form a stable secondary complex. The resulting emulsions showed stable adsorption on the biphasic interface with negligible changes in droplet size during storage, presenting a novel strategy for emulsion stabilization protocols.
Oil in water (o/w) emulsions are ubiquitous in food systems, where the stabilization of a homogeneous biphasic texture is necessary. In this study, binary protein particles (CRPs) with hydrophilic shells (cod proteins) and hydrophobic cores (rice proteins) were fabricated as stabilizers of o/w emulsions. To circumvent their instability at the interface due to conformational changes, the CRPs were further reinforced by starch nanocrystals (SNCs) to form a secondary complex (CRP@SNCs). Results from cryo-scanning electron microscope and confocal laser scanning microscope confirmed the stable adsorption of SNC-reinforced CRPs on the biphasic interface with excessive SNCs as the spacers separating the adjacent oil droplets, leading to emulsions featuring both Pickeringtype and steric-type stabilization. At the optimum SNCs/CRPs mass ratio, the emulsions showed undetectable phase-separation and negligible changes in droplet size during the tested storage for up to 28 days. Our study presents a facile strategy for innovating novel stabilization protocols for emulsions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据