4.7 Article

CIELAB-Spectral image MATCHING: An app for merging colorimetric and spectral images for grapes and derivatives

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108038

关键词

CIELAB; NIR; Spectral imaging; Image matching; MATLAB

资金

  1. Programa Operativo FEDER 2014-2020/Consejeria de Economia y Conocimiento de la Junta de Andalucia [US-1261752]
  2. FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion - Agencia Estatal de Investigacion [AGL2017-84793-C2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of imaging techniques to combine color and spectral information for quality assessment in food products is an effective method, despite challenges. This approach has been successfully applied to grape and grape seed samples, showing that merged images can better differentiate between varieties.
Imaging techniques have revolutionised the way quality is assessed in food products. Using cameras, it is possible to estimate not only the chemical composition of a product but also its geometric distribution. However, the limited range of detectors implies the use of different measuring equipment. The presence of small and discrete samples or very heterogeneous samples makes joining both sets of data a complicated task. This work arises from the need to merge images with colour information and NIR spectral information on grape samples and derivatives. An application has been created under MATLAB to join this type of images so that it is possible to simultaneously extract the colour and/or spectral information of each pixel or object present in the image. Although the software can be used in a wide range of applications, it has been successfully applied to grape and grape seed samples. In red grape bunches, it was possible to evaluate individually grapes and notice differences due to changes in visible and infrared regions at the same time. In the case of white grape seeds, it was proved that merged images were better to discriminate between varieties than the single CIELAB or spectral images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据