4.7 Review

Effects of exogenous methyl jasmonate on quality and preservation of postharvest fruits: A review

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 353, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129482

关键词

Methyl jasmonate; Fruit postharvest preservation; Fruit quality; Chilling stress; Fungal diseases

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [3201101306, 81803407]
  2. Nantong Applied Research Program [MS12017023-8]
  3. Natural Science Research Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions [18KJB180023]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is a volatile hormone that acts as a signal in response to external stresses in plants. It has been shown to enhance fruit antioxidant capacity and phenolics content, leading to extended shelf-life, improved quality, and reduced chilling injury. Additionally, postharvest application of MeJA can alter volatiles pattern and enhance the innate disease resistance of fruits against pathogenic fungi.
Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is a volatile hormone involved in a number of plant processes, acting as a signal in response to external stresses and modulating the biosynthesis of other phytohormones. Here, we are reviewing for the first time all reports related to the effects of exogenous MeJA on postharvest fruits. Application of MeJA during preharvest and postharvest stages has been demonstrated to enhance fruit antioxidant capacity and phenolics content, which in turn extended fruit shelf-life, enhanced fruit quality and reduced chilling injury. The postharvest application of MeJA has been reported to alter volatiles pattern and to enhance the innate disease resistance of postharvest fruits against pathogenic fungi. The results obtained using different treatment conditions, such as temperature, storage time and concentration, have been highlighted and compared along the manuscript in order to provide new insights on the applicability of MeJA for enhancing postharvest fruit quality and preservation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据