4.7 Article

Heat induced hydrolytic cleavage of the peptide bond in dietary peptides and proteins in food processing

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129621

关键词

Proteins; Peptides; Thermal processing; Amide bond; Hydrolysis; HPLC-MS

资金

  1. Jacobs University Bremen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that proteins and peptides are thermally degraded through hydrolytic bond cleavage of amide bonds, forming shorter peptides as the main degradation products. The analysis revealed that hydrolytic cleavage is an important, but not dominant pathway of degradation. When heated, intact dietary proteins produce larger degradation products, while coffee globulin forms short peptides through thermal proteolysis.
We investigate the hypothesis that proteins and peptides are thermally degraded by hydrolytic bond cleavage of amide bonds, hence yielding shorter peptides as main degradation products. A series of fifteen pentapeptides with varying sequences was subjected to heating. Products were investigated by targeted UHPLC-ESI-tandem mass spectrometry and targeted analysis revealed formation of 2,5-diketopiperazines, di- and tri-peptides. Relative quantities of the thermal degradation were determined to show that hydrolytic cleavage is an important, however not dominant degradation pathway. A series of dietary intact proteins were subjected to heating and products formed analyzed by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. For the majority of proteins larger degradation products with m/z values between 900 and 2500 could be observed, which we tentatively assign as hydrolytic cleavage products. For coffee globulin a series of eleven short peptides formed through thermal hydrolytic cleavage could be unambiguously identified formed through thermal proteolysis. The identical products could as well be identified in samples of roasted coffee clearly illustrating the occurrence and relevance of thermally induced proteolysis of proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据