4.7 Article

Improved color stability of anthocyanins in the presence of ascorbic acid with the combination of rosmarinic acid and xanthan gum

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 351, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129317

关键词

Anthocyanins; Stability; Noncovalent interaction; Xanthan gum; Rosmarinic acid; Molecular simulation

资金

  1. Support Project of High-level Teachers in Beijing Municipal Universities in the Period of the 13th Five-year Plan [CITTCD201704042, IDHT20180506]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2018YFC1604203-2, 2018YFD0400403]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701575]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combined use of rosmarinic acid and xanthan gum was found to significantly enhance the stability of anthocyanins, primarily through intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces. Xanthan gum exhibited stronger binding interactions with anthocyanins in the ternary complexes compared to rosmarinic acid. This study provides valuable insights into enhancing the stability of anthocyanins in the presence of ascorbic acid.
This study investigated the protective effect and mechanism of action of combined use of rosmarinic acid (RA) and xanthan gum (XG) on the stability of anthocyanins (ACNs) in the presence of L-ascorbic acid (pH 3.0). The addition of RA and XG, alone and in combination, significantly enhanced the color stability of ACNs, and the combined use of RA and XG showed the best effect. FTIR, 1H NMR, AFM and computational molecular simulation analyses revealed that the improvement in ACN stability following the combined addition of RA and XG was due to intermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces. In the ACN-RA-XG ternary complexes, XG had stronger binding interactions with ACNs than RA. Our findings provide a valuable potential to enhance the stability of ACNs in the presence of ascorbic acid with the combined use of RA and XG.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据