4.7 Article

Simultaneous quantification of chemical constituents in matcha with visible-near infrared hyperspectral imaging technology*

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129141

关键词

Hyperspectral imaging; Tea powder; Spectra; Chemical constituents; Variables selection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801633]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20190100]
  3. Project of Faculty of Agricultural Equipment of Jiangsu University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the feasibility of identifying multiple chemical constituents in matcha using VNIR-HSI technology, achieving best predictive accuracy with BOSS-PLS models for caffeine, tea polyphenols, free amino acids, TPs to FAAs ratio, and chlorophyll. The findings highlight the potential of VNIR-HSI as a rapid and nondestructive method for quantifying chemical constituents in matcha simultaneously.
This study aimed to assess the feasibility of identifying multiple chemical constituents in matcha using visible near infrared hyperspectral imaging (VNIR-HSI) technology. Regions of interest (ROIs) were first defined in order to calculate the representative mean spectrum of each sample. Subsequently, the standard normal variate (SNV) method was applied to correct the characteristic spectra. Competitive adaptive reweighted sampling (CARS) and bootstrapping soft shrinkage (BOSS) were used to optimize the models. They were built based on partial least squares (PLS), creating two models referred to as CARS-PLS and BOSS-PLS. The BOSS-PLS models achieved best predictive accuracy, with coefficients of determination predicted to be 0.8077 for caffeine, 0.7098 for tea polyphenols (TPs), 0.7942 for free amino acids (FAAs), 0.8314 for the ratio of TPs to FAAs, and 0.8473 for chlorophyll. These findings highlight the potential of VNIR-HSI technology as a rapid and nondestructive alternative for simultaneous quantification of chemical constituents in matcha.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据