4.7 Article

Extrusion improves the phenolic profile and biological activities of hempseed (Cannabis sativa L.) hull

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 346, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128606

关键词

Hempseed hull; Phenolic compounds; alpha-Glucosidase inhibition activity; Acetylcholinesterase inhibition activity; Antioxidant capacity; HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS; HPLC-DAD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extrusion of hempseed hull at different barrel temperature and screw speed led to increased total phenolic content, antioxidant activities, and inhibition of α-glucosidase and acetylcholinesterase. Interaction between extrusion parameters influenced the phenolic/flavonoid content, antioxidant activities, and enzyme inhibition. Various phenylpropionamides were identified, with N-trans-caffeoyltyramine showing significant positive correlation with biological activities.
The impact of extrusion at different barrel temperature and screw speed on the hempseed hull was investigated. The extrusion treatments showed significant (p < 0.05) increase in total phenolic content, proportion of free phenolic compounds, and DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities. At low screw speed (150 rpm), significantly (p < 0.05) higher a-glucosidase and acetylcholinesterase inhibition activities were observed in the extruded samples. The full factorial model revealed a significant interaction between extrusion parameters on total phenolic/flavonoid content and antioxidant activities for free fraction, and alpha-glucosidase and acetylcholinesterase inhibition for whole fraction. A total of 26 phenylpropionamides, including hydroxycinnamic acid amides and lignanamides, were identified by HPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS. HPLC-DAD analysis showed a 25-78% increase in total phenylpropionamide content in hempseed hull after extrusion. Pearson's correlation displayed significant (p < 0.05) positive correlation of N-trans-caffeoyltyramine, the most abundant phenylpmpionamide, with all biological activities (r = 0.832-0.940).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据