4.7 Article

Exploring the mode of binding between butylated hydroxyanisole with bovine serum albumin: Multispectroscopic and molecular docking study

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129771

关键词

Butylated hydroxyanisole; Bovine serum albumin; Interaction; Fluorescence quenching; Food additive

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676028, 41602351]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the binding of BHA to serum albumin occurs through static quenching, forming a relatively stable complex with hydrophobic interactions as the main binding mechanism. BHA has the capability to bind to specific sites on BSA, and the presence of other food additives weakens the binding of BHA to BSA.
Considering the harm of BHA on humans, thorough research of the effect of BHA on the structure of serum albumin is necessary. The binding mechanisms of BHA with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and the effects of other three food additives (butylated hydroxytoluene, benzoic acid and citric acid) on BHA-BSA system were researched by multispectroscopy and molecular docking. The fluorescence quenching experiment results showed that the fluorescence quenching mechanism of BSA by BHA was static quenching. The binding constant ((5.70 +/- 0.38) x 103 M-1 at 298 K) and thermodynamic parameters (All = 110.8 +/- 2.91 kJ center dot mol-1 and AS = 443.3 +/- 9.30 J center dot mol-1 center dot K-1) indicated that BHA and BSA formed a relatively stable complex through hydrophobic interaction. Three-dimensional fluorescence spectra confirmed the conformation changes of BSA due to the binding of BHA. Site marker competitive experiments and molecular docking proved that BHA could bind BSA into site I in subdomain IIA. The results of molecular docking showed that BHA formed hydrophobic interactions with amino acid residues (Ala290, Leu237, Leu259, Ile263 and Ile289). The presence of other food additives weakened the binding of BHA to BSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据