4.7 Article

Comparison of physicochemical and umami characterization of aqueous and ethanolic Takifugu obscurus muscle extracts

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112317

关键词

Ethanolic extracts; Takifugu obscurus; Taste characterization; NMR; Nano LC-MS; Antioxidant peptides

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901813, 31972198, 32001827]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the molecular weight distributions and sensory characteristics of ethanol and aqueous Takifugu obscurus muscle extracts. The results indicated that the 60% ethanolic extract fraction had the highest umami intensity and more palatable overall taste among all pufferfish extracts. The study also identified an antioxidant activity in the 60% ethanolic extract fraction and screened several antioxidant peptides.
Most umami substances were developed in aqueous extracts. In this study, we compared the molecular weight distributions and sensory characteristics of ethanol and aqueous Takifugu obscurus muscle extracts, and assessed their taste-related metabolites and peptide profile (< 3 kDa) using nuclear magnetic resonance and nano liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The potential antioxidant peptide in ethanolic fraction was screened using Peptide Ranker, BIOPEP and quantum chemical simulations. The results indicated that 60% ethanolic extract fraction (60%-F) had the highest umami intensity and more palatable overall taste among all pufferfish extracts. It can be caused by more umami enhancing components such as Asp, Asn, Ala and 5 '-AMP, and considerable umami-potential smaller peptides in 60%-F. 60%-F also showed an antioxidant activity, and several antioxidant peptides was screened. The present study indicated the relationship between extract solution and taste characterization, which provided more possibility for the exploitation of umami substances and screening potential activity peptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据