4.5 Article

Fatigue life prediction for the main spar with wrinkle defects of a wind turbine blade

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.13545

关键词

damage accumulation; defect assessment; fatigue life prediction; infrared thermography; turbine blade component

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575361]
  2. Program Science and Technology Innovation for Middle-aged and Young Talents of Shenyang [190365]
  3. Key Laboratory of Vibration and Control of Aero-Propulsion System Ministry of Education, Northeastern University [VCAME 201905]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a practical method for predicting fatigue life of the main spar with wrinkle defects in a wind turbine blade. It quantifies the effect of different wrinkle geometry on stiffness in a composite laminate and develops a fatigue life prediction model containing unknown parameters. The model accuracy is verified through experimental data.
A practical method for predicting fatigue life of the main spar with wrinkle defects in a wind turbine blade is presented in this paper. First, the effect of different wrinkle geometry on stiffness in a composite laminate is quantified. Then, the model of intrinsic dissipated energy is proposed to determine the fatigue limit rapidly. A fatigue life prediction model containing unknown parameters is developed by introducing intrinsic dissipated energy to characterize stiffness degradation of the main spar laminate with wrinkle defects. The specimens with different wrinkle geometry are subjected to fatigue tests, monitored with an infrared thermography system to obtain experimental data. After determining the unknown parameters of the developed model, the S-N curves of specimens are evaluated in a relatively short time. The predicted fatigue life is within the 95% confidence interval of lifetime obtained by the traditional tests, which suggests the developed model is accurate. This work is suitable for fatigue life prediction of main spar with different wrinkle defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据