4.7 Article

p53 regulation by MDM2 contributes to self-renewal and differentiation of basal stem cells in mouse and human airway epithelium

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.202100638R

关键词

airway epithelial cells; MDM2; p53

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy [RYC-2015-17867, BFU2014-54699-P, BFU2017-85547-P]
  2. Junta de Extremadura [IB18014, GR15164]
  3. European Union FEDER program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proper physiological function of mammalian airways relies on the differentiation and self-renewal ability of basal stem cells, with p53 playing a crucial role in regulating this process. The MDM2-p53 signaling pathway is important for maintaining basal stem cell differentiation and proper cell proliferation in the airway epithelium, suggesting it as a potential target for controlling epithelial regeneration.
Proper physiological function of mammalian airways requires the differentiation of basal stem cells into secretory or multiciliated cells, among others. In addition, the self-renewal ability of these basal stem cells is crucial for developing a quick response to toxic agents in order to re-establish the epithelial barrier function of the airways. Although these epithelial missions are vital, little is known about those mechanism controlling airway epithelial regeneration in health and disease. p53 has been recently proposed as the guardian of homeostasis, promoting differentiation programs, and antagonizing a de-differentiation program. Here, we exploit mouse and human tracheal epithelial cell culture models to study the role of MDM2-p53 signaling in self-renewal and differentiation in the airway epithelium. We show that p53 protein regulation by MDM2 is crucial for basal stem cell differentiation and to keep proper cell proliferation. Therefore, we suggest that MDM2/p53 interaction modulation is a potential target to control regeneration of the mammalian airway epithelia without massively affecting the epithelium integrity and differentiation potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据