4.5 Article

The association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and endothelial dysfunction in people living with HIV on stable antiretroviral therapy

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 113-120

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2021.1933438

关键词

Antiretroviral; endothelial dysfunction; HIV; hs-CRP; lymphocyte; neutrophil; NLR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In long-term ART-treated PLWH with high NLR, there is a curvilinear association between NLR and bFMD, but NLR has low discriminatory ability towards predicting endothelial dysfunction.
Background Residual inflammation is thought to promote endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease risk among people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART). Whether the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a putative marker of systemic inflammation, may be associated with endothelial dysfunction has not been investigated in PLWH on stable ART. Research design and methods In this cross-sectional study, 210 PLWH (mean age 49 years, 79% males, 88/7/5% Caucasians/Africans/Hispanics) on long-term ART (median ART duration 8 years) were enrolled among those who were afferent to an Infectious Diseases outpatient clinic. The association between NLR and brachial flow-mediated dilation (bFMD) was analysed. Results A curvilinear association was observed between logarithmic-NLR and logarithmic-bFMD (R square = 0.034, p = 0.027), with logarithmic-bFMD decreasing significantly with increasing logarithmic-NLR only in PLWH with high NLR (>= 1.47, median NLR) (r = -0.369, p < 0.001). However, NLR had a poor accuracy in the prediction of low bFMD (<= 4.55, median bFMD) in PLWH with high NLR (55% sensitivity, 80% specificity, Youden index 0.35 for NLR 2.20). Conclusions Although there is an inverse association between NLR and bFMD among long-term ART-treated PLWH with high NLR, NLR has a low discriminatory ability toward endothelial dysfunction in this category of patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据