4.3 Article

Safety and tolerability evaluation of erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
卷 20, 期 8, 页码 867-876

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1933941

关键词

Erenumab; AMG334; adverse events; migraine; safety

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review found no safety and tolerability concerns related to the use of erenumab in migraine treatment. The most common adverse events were local skin reactions and constipation, but there were no severe adverse events or frequent events leading to treatment discontinuation. Overall, treatment with erenumab was well tolerated.
Introduction: Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), is the first disease-specific and mechanism-based treatment approved for the prevention of migraine. Although the safety and tolerability data from randomized trials are clear, the physiological effects of CGRP rise reasonable concerns. We aimed to evaluate the current evidence for safety and tolerability related to erenumab use in migraine. Areas covered: This review outlines the severe adverse events (AEs), common AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation and AEs of special interest, reported in all phase 2, phase 3, open label, and observational studies with erenumab in migraine. Individual safety reports were also included in the systematic review of evidence. Expert opinion: No safety and tolerability flags were detected in this review. The most common AE are local skin reactions and constipation. No severe AEs, or frequent AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were detected. Treatment is well tolerated. The only AE of interest that may play a role in decision making and treatment monitoring is constipation. These findings are in line with previous safety reports, further highlighting the substantial tolerability and safety profile of the modern anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for the prevention of migraine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据