4.3 Letter

Thromboembolic events in younger women exposed to Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
卷 20, 期 11, 页码 1451-1453

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1955101

关键词

Vaccine; thrombosis; COVID-19; VAERS; FAERS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study looked at cases of thrombosis in women under 50 following Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccination in the US, and found that these events were not disproportionately reported compared to hormonal contraceptive use.
Introduction: Concerns about the increased risk of blood clots associated with the VAXZEVRIA (previously named Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine) and Johnson & Johnson (Janssen) COVID-19 vaccines raises the question of the thrombotic safety of other COVID-19 vaccines such as Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, especially in younger women, who at the early stage of the pandemic was a priority group for vaccination. Methods: Using the US-based Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the FDA Event Reporting System (FAERS), we retrieved cases of thrombosis following vaccinations or hormonal contraceptive use in women aged <= 50 years. We used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a disproportionality measure. Results: On 19 March 2021, out of 13.6 million women aged <= 50 exposed to at least one dose of Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in the US, only 61 cases were reported with a total of 68 thromboembolic events (1 case per 222,951 vaccinated). None of the thromboembolic events included in our analysis were disproportionally reported for the two COVID-19 vaccines. Conclusion: Our results do support that, when compared to hormonal contraceptive use, the mRNA vaccines do not show disproportional reporting of thromboembolic events in younger women.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据