4.5 Review

Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in adults with schizophrenia: a review of challenges and strategies

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 1211-1221

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2021.1974400

关键词

Clozapine; therapeutic drug monitoring; tdm; side effects; seizure; agranulocytosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clozapine is an effective drug for treating schizophrenia, but its dose-dependent side effects and the risk of agranulocytosis limit its use. Therapeutic drug monitoring can guide individual dosing, but current methods are unable to predict the risk of agranulocytosis.
Introduction Clozapine (CLZ) is the superior drug in treatment of schizophrenia. Serum concentration of CLZ is associated with clinical response and dose-dependents side effects, where generalized tonic-clonic seizures are most critical. Thus, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of CLZ may guide individual dosing to reach target exposure and prevent dose-dependent side effects. However, current TDM methods are not capable of predicting the risk of agranulocytosis, which is a dose-independent side effect restricting use of CLZ to treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Areas covered The article provides an overview of clinical, pharmacological, and toxicological aspects of CLZ, and the role of TDM as a tool for dose titration and follow-up in patients with TRS. Main focus is on current challenges and strategies in CLZ TDM, including future perspectives on potential identification/analysis of CLZ metabolite biomarkers reflecting the risk of granulocyte toxicity. Expert opinion The association between CLZ serum concentration, clinical response and risk of seizures is indisputable. TDM should therefore always guide CLZ dose titration. Development of advanced TDM methods, including biomarkers predicting the risk of granulocyte toxicity might extend TDM to be a tool for deciding which patients that can be treated safely with CLZ, potentially increasing its utility beyond TRS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据