4.3 Article

Use of brodalumab for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis: a one-year real-life study in the Lazio region, Italy

期刊

EXPERT OPINION ON BIOLOGICAL THERAPY
卷 21, 期 9, 页码 1299-1309

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1941862

关键词

Anti-il17a; brodalumab; erythroderma; PASIpsoriasis; plaque psoriasis; pustular; real-life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Real-life study on 90 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with brodalumab showed that after 48 weeks, 92.2% of patients achieved a PASI score of <3. This suggests that brodalumab is effective and safe in treating patients with moderate-to-severe chronic psoriasis in a real-world setting.
Background: Information is limited from real-life studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of brodalumab. Research design and methods: In this real-life study, we retrospectively examined a database of 90 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with brodalumab (210 mg, s.c.) and followed for 1 year. Disease severity and treatment response were assessed by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at baseline and after 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks. Predictors of a PASI response were evaluated by logistic regression. Results: After 48 weeks, 92.2% of patients (mean age 50.2 +/- 15 years) treated with brodalumab achieved a PASI score of <3. PASI score decreased from 17.4 +/- 10.3 at baseline to 1.7 +/- 3.9 and 1.4 +/- 3.7 at 12 and 24 weeks, and PASI 75, 90, and 100 response was achieved in 87.3%, 81.8%, and 72.7% of patients, respectively, at 48 weeks. Univariate regression revealed that previous exposure to anti-IL17A treatment was associated with poorer PASI response between 36 and 48 weeks. In difficult-to-treat cases previously having failed with other biologics, brodalumab significantly improved outcome, leading to complete remission. Conclusion: Brodalumab was observed to be effective and safe in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic psoriasis in a real-world setting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据