4.5 Article

Temporal evolution of the biological response to laser-induced refractive index change (LIRIC) in rabbit corneas

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2021.108579

关键词

Refractive surgery; Stroma; TUNEL; Wound healing; Myofibroblasts; Corneal nerves; Corneal endothelial cells

资金

  1. NYSTAR through the University of Rochester's Center for Emerging and Innovative Sciences (CEIS)
  2. Clerio Vision, Inc.
  3. National Eye Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01 EY015836, P30 EY001319]
  4. Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation (RPB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

LIRIC is a novel femtosecond photomodification technique for vision correction that shows minimal cell death and stable corneal structure in rabbit eyes, suggesting potential safety and reduced risk of post-operative complications compared to traditional laser vision correction surgeries.
Laser-induced refractive index change (LIRIC) is a new, non-incisional, non-ablative, femtosecond photomodification technique being developed for vision correction in humans. Prior, ex vivo studies showed intratissue refractive index change to induce minimal cell death, restricted to the laser focal zone in the corneal stroma, and with no observable damage to the epithelium or endothelium. Here, we used live rabbits to ascertain longer-term consequences of LIRIC in vivo. Specifically, we assessed cell death, fibrosis, corneal nerve distribution, endothelial cell density, and corneal structure for up to 3 months after LIRIC. A +2.5 D gradient-index LIRIC Fresnel lens was inscribed inside 20 applanated corneas of Dutch Belted rabbits, over a circular region of the midstroma measuring 4.5 mm in diameter. Twelve additional rabbit eyes were used as applanation-only controls to differentiate the effects of laser treatment and suction applanation on biological and structural parameters. In vivo optical measurements were performed pre-operatively, then immediately, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after the procedure, to measure endothelial cell density and changes in corneal structure. Groups of four rabbits were sacrificed at 4 hours, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after LIRIC for histological determinations; the TUNEL assay was used to evaluate cell death, H&E staining was used to assess inflammatory infiltration, and immunostaining for alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) and beta III tubulin (Tuj-1) was performed to assess myofibroblast differentiation and corneal nerve distribution, respectively. Consistent with prior ex vivo data, only minimal cell death was observed in the laser focal zone, with TUNEL-positive cells restricted to the stromal region of refractive index change 4 h after LIRIC. No TUNEL-positive cells were evident anywhere in the cornea 2, 4, or 12 weeks after LIRIC. Applanationonly corneas were completely TUNEL-negative. Neither LIRIC-treated nor applanation-only eyes exhibited alpha-SMA-positive staining or altered corneal nerve distributions at any of the time points examined. In vivo confocal imaging revealed normal endothelial cell densities in all eyes (whether LIRIC-treated or applanation-only) at all time points. Optical coherence tomography showed suction applanation to cause a temporary decrease in central corneal thickness, which returned to normal within 4 h. Corneas into which LIRIC Fresnel lenses were written while applanated did not undergo major structural or shape changes beyond the temporary thinning already described for suction applanation. The present findings suggest that LIRIC patterns, which generated a clinicallyrelevant refractive correction in the mid-stromal region of live rabbit corneas, induced little-to-no disruption to corneal structure and biology for 3 months after the procedure. This affirms the relative safety of LIRIC and predicts that compared to traditional laser vision correction surgeries, common post-operative complications such as dry eye, haze, or patient discomfort may be entirely avoided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据