4.6 Article

Can plantar fibroblast implantation protect amputees from skin injury? A recipe for skin augmentation

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 1829-1833

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.14419

关键词

finite element model; keratin 9; load tolerance; pressure ulcer; residual limb

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N026845/1]
  2. Marie Sklodowska-Curie EU [892407]
  3. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [892407] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)
  4. EPSRC [EP/N026845/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel strategy to enhance skin's tolerance to load by autologous transplantation of plantar fibroblasts into the residual limb dermis, reducing mechanically induced injuries. Reprogramming skin to a plantar-like phenotype could potentially halve pressure ulcer injuries.
Skin injuries remain a persistent problem for users of lower-limb prostheses despite sustained progress in prosthesis design. One factor limiting the prevention of skin injuries is that skin on the residual limb is not suited to bear the mechanical loads of ambulation. One part of the body that is suited to this task is the sole of the foot. Here, we propose a novel strategy to actively augment skin's tolerance to load, increasing its resistance to mechanically induced injuries. We hypothesise that the load tolerance of skin can be augmented by autologous transplantation of plantar fibroblasts into the residual limb dermis. We expect that introducing plantar fibroblasts will induce the overlying keratinocytes to express plantar-specific keratins leading to a tougher epidermis. Using a computational finite element model of a weight-bearing residual limb, we estimate that skin deformation (a key driver of pressure ulcer injuries) could be halved by reprogramming skin to a plantar-like phenotype. We believe this strategy could yield new progress in pressure ulcer prevention for amputees, facilitating rehabilitation and improving quality of life for patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据