4.7 Article

Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation for multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma versus unifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a propensity-matched cohort study

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 1216-1226

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08133-z

关键词

Ablation techniques; Radiofrequency ablation; Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; Ultrasonography; Propensity score

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of multifocality on the prognosis after RFA for low-risk PTMC was minimal, indicating that RFA may be a promising treatment for both unifocal and multifocal PTMC in properly selected patients after sufficient preoperative evaluation.
Objective To investigate and compare the clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for multifocal papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) versus unifocal PTMC in a large cohort. Methods Patients with low-risk PTMC (n = 487) who underwent RFA were included in this retrospective study and divided into the unifocal group (U group) (n = 432) and the multifocal group (M group) (n = 55) according to the number of lesions. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), volume, volume reduction ratio (VRR), the development of local tumor progression including lymph node metastasis (LNM), recurrent PTMC and persistent lesions, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The different impacts of multifocality on recurrence after RFA for PTMC were investigated by Cox analysis. Results During a mean follow-up time of 49.25 +/- 12.98 months, the overall VRR was 99.40 +/- 4.43% and the overall incidence of local tumor progression was 3.70% (18/487). No complications occurred after RFA. After PSM, no significant differences were found in volume (0.11 +/- 0.69 mm(3) vs 0 mm(3), p = 0.441), VRR (99.87 +/- 0.78% vs 100%, p = 0.441), complete disappearance rate (95.61% vs 89.09%, p = 0.201), incidence of local tumor progression (5.45% vs 5.45%, p = 1.000), LNM (1.82% vs 0%, p = 0.317), recurrent PTMC (1.82% vs 5.45%, p = 0.611), persistent lesions (1.82% vs 0%, p = 0.317), and RFS rate (96.36% vs 94.55%, p = 0.632) between the M group and U group. The association between multifocality and local tumor recurrence also remained nonsignificant (p = 0.619). No distant metastasis or delayed surgery occurred. Conclusions The impact of multifocality on the prognosis after RFA for low-risk PTMC was little. RFA might be a promising treatment for both unifocal and multifocal PTMC in properly selected patients after sufficient preoperative evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据