4.7 Article

Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2D and 3D MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis

期刊

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 9468-9478

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08053-y

关键词

MR elastography; 2D and 3D MRE; Fibrosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91959118]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201704020016]
  3. Clinical Research Foundation of the 3rd Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University [YHJH201901]
  4. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2021A1515010582]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

3D MRE has higher image quality and interobserver agreement compared to 2D MRE, but similar diagnostic performance in detecting and staging liver fibrosis. Both 2D and 3D MRE methods outperform blood-based biomarkers in accuracy for >= F2, >= F3, and F4 fibrosis stages.
Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of state-of-the-art 2D MR elastography (MRE) and 3D MRE in the basic application of liver fibrosis staging. Methods This retrospective study assessed data from 293 patients who underwent 2D and 3D MRE examinations. MRE image quality was assessed with a qualitative 2-point grading system by evaluating artifacts. Two experienced analysts independently measured mean liver stiffness values. The interobserver agreement of liver stiffness measurement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic performance of 2D and 3D MRE and blood-based markers for fibrosis staging using the pathology-proven liver fibrosis stage as the gold standard. Results The image quality provided by 3D MRE was graded as significantly higher than that obtained with the 2D MRE method (p < 0.01). Interobserver agreement in liver stiffness measurements was higher for 3D MRE (ICC: 3D 0.979 vs 2D 0.955). The AUC values for discriminating >= F1, >= F2, >= F3, and F4 fibrosis for 3D MRE (0.89, 0.92, 0.95, and 0.93) were similar to those for 2D MRE (0.89, 0.91, 0.94, and 0.92). Both the 2D and 3D MRE methods provided superior accuracy to the blood-based biomarkers, including APRI, FIB-4, and Forns index, especially for >= F2, >= F3, and F4 fibrosis stages (all p < 0.01). Conclusions While 3D MRE offers certain advantages and opportunities for new applications of MRE, current widely deployed 2D MRE technology has comparable performance in the basic application of detecting and staging liver fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据