4.5 Article

Deep learning-based automated detection of pulmonary embolism on CT pulmonary angiograms: No significant effects on report communication times and patient turnaround in the emergency department nine months after technical implementation

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109816

关键词

Pulmonary embolism; Computed tomography pulmonary angiograms; Artificial intelligence; Clinical workflow; Communication; Emergency department

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the role of deep learning algorithm in detecting PE in CTPAs and improving communication efficiency with the emergency department through an ENS. The research found that while the algorithm performed well, the introduction of these tools alone was not sufficient to significantly impact clinical performance measures.
Objectives: Rapid communication of CT exams positive for pulmonary embolism (PE) is crucial for timely initiation of anticoagulation and patient outcome. It is unknown if deep learning automated detection of PE on CT Pulmonary Angiograms (CTPA) in combination with worklist prioritization and an electronic notification system (ENS) can improve communication times and patient turnaround in the Emergency Department (ED). Methods: In 01/2019, an ENS allowing direct communication between radiology and ED was installed. Starting in 10/2019, CTPAs were processed by a deep learning (DL)-powered algorithm for detection of PE. CTPAs acquired between 04/2018 and 06/2020 (n = 1808) were analysed. To assess the impact of the ENS and the DL-algorithm, radiology report reading times (RRT), radiology report communication time (RCT), time to anticoagulation (TTA), and patient turnaround times (TAT) in the ED were compared for three consecutive time periods. Performance measures of the algorithm were calculated on a per exam level (sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, F1score), with written reports and exam review as ground truth. Results: Sensitivity of the algorithm was 79.6 % (95 %CI:70.8-87.2%), specificity 95.0 % (95 %CI:92.0-97.1%), PPV 82.2 % (95 %CI:73.9-88.3), and NPV 94.1 % (95 %CI:91.4-96 %). There was no statistically significant reduction of any of the observed times (RRT, RCT, TTA, TAT). Conclusion: DL-assisted detection of PE in CTPAs and ENS-assisted communication of results to referring physicians technically work. However, the mere clinical introduction of these tools, even if they exhibit a good performance, is not sufficient to achieve significant effects on clinical performance measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据