4.6 Review

Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 181, 期 1, 页码 9-22

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00431-021-04171-3

关键词

Blood pressure; Pediatric population; Hypertension; Validity

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation-FAPESP [2019/24224-1]
  2. FAPESP [019/13527-3, 2017/20317-0, 2019/02617-1]
  3. School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil FAPESP [2019/10852-0]
  4. School of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to test the accuracy of automatic blood pressure monitor devices compared to mercury sphygmomanometers in children and adolescents, finding that automatic blood pressure monitors have strong measurement validity in this population.
With the progressive elimination of mercury column devices for blood pressure (BP) measurement in children and adolescents, valid alternatives are needed. Oscillometric devices provide a replacement without mercury, are fully automated, and have excellent reliability among evaluators. Here, the goal was to test the accuracy of automatic blood pressure monitor devices compared to the mercury sphygmomanometer for BP measurement in children and adolescents. Electronic databases are EMBASE, MEDLINE (PubMed), SCOPUS, and Web of Science. We selected 8974 potentially eligible articles and two authors independently. We separately reviewed 370 full papers. Potentially eligible articles were selected according to the following criteria: (a) articles published in Portuguese, English, and Spanish; (b) screening of titles; (c) screening of abstracts; and (d) retrieval and screening of the full article to determine whether it met the inclusion criteria. We included 45 articles for analysis, 28 of which were selected for meta-analysis. The systolic BP measured by automatic blood pressure monitors presents 1.17 mmHg on average (95% CI 0.85; 1.48); for diastolic BP, it produced -0.08 mmHg (95% CI -0.69; 0.54) compared with a mercury sphygmomanometer. There is high heterogeneity between studies (> 90%) in the meta-analysis, partly explained by the device model, study environment, and observer training. Only articles that reported BP measurement by both methods were included. Conclusion: Automatic blood pressure monitors have strong measurement validity when compared with the mercury column. Thus, these can be safely used in blood pressure measurements of children and adolescents in clinical and epidemiological studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据