4.7 Article

Combining Dantzig-Wolfe and Benders decompositions to solve a large-scale nuclear outage planning problem

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 298, 期 3, 页码 1067-1083

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.018

关键词

OR in energy; Nuclear outage scheduling; Integer programming; Dantzig-Wolfe decomposition; Benders decomposition

资金

  1. EDF
  2. PGMO foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Optimizing nuclear unit outages is crucial for the economic performance of French electricity company EDF, as it involves substituting more expensive means to meet electricity demand. This study proposes a combined decomposition approach to tackle the challenges posed by the specific operating constraints of nuclear units, stochastic demand and non-nuclear unit availability, and the scale of the problem. The approach incorporates the operating constraints into a Dantzig-Wolfe pricing subproblem and handles demand and non-nuclear unit availability using Benders decomposition. The scalability of the approach is demonstrated on real-life instances of the French nuclear fleet.
Optimizing nuclear unit outages is of significant economic importance for the French electricity company EDF, as these outages induce a substitute production by other more expensive means to fulfill electricity demand. This problem is quite challenging given the specific operating constraints of nuclear units, the stochasticity of both the demand and non-nuclear units availability, and the scale of the instances. To tackle these difficulties we use a combined decomposition approach. The operating constraints of the nuclear units are built into a Dantzig-Wolfe pricing subproblem whose solutions define the columns of a demand covering formulation. The scenarios of demand and non-nuclear units availability are handled in a Benders decomposition. Our approach is shown to scale up to the real-life instances of the French nuclear fleet. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据