4.3 Article

Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in women with endometriosis

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.002

关键词

Endometriosis; Complementary and alternative medicine CAM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the majority of women with endometriosis are interested in using CAM methods, but only a minority have detailed knowledge about it. Nevertheless, a majority of the patients had used at least one CAM method to relieve symptoms associated with the disease, with exercise being the most frequently used method.
Objective: This study aimed to provide an overview of the extent to which women with endometriosis are informed about, interested in, and make use of CAM, and to evaluate which of the methods are most often applied. Study Design: A retrospective, two-center cohort study was conducted using a validated questionnaire among women with laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis at two urban teaching hospitals, certified as endometriosis centres. Results: A total of 592 patients were included in the study and received the questionnaire; 114 (19.3 %) were included in the data analysis. Most of the women were not receiving hormone therapy at the time of the study (n = 60, 52.6 %). Most (n = 75, 65.8 %) were interested in CAM, but only a minority (n = 12, 10.5 %) had detailed knowledge about it. A total of 81 patients (71.1 %) had used at least one CAM method for disease management; the five most frequently used CAM methods were exercise (n = 55, 48.2 %), vitamins (n = 40, 35.1 %), yoga (n = 38, 33.3 %), homeopathy (n = 32, 28.1 %), and trace elements (n = 27, 23.7 %). Conclusions: In our study population, women with endometriosis are strongly interested in using CAM, but have only limited information about it. Nevertheless, a majority of the patients had used at least one CAM method to relieve symptoms associated with the disease and the most often used was exercise. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据