4.2 Article

Long-term tolerability and efficacy after initial PegIFN-alpha addition to dasatinib in CML-CP: Five-year follow-up of the NordCML007 study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 107, 期 6, 页码 617-623

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13699

关键词

BCR-ABL Positive; chronic myelogenous leukemia; clinical trial; dasatinib; interferon-alpha

资金

  1. BMS
  2. MSD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adding low dose PegIFN-alpha to DAS in the treatment of CML-CP patients has shown good long-term efficacy without increased toxicity, with the majority of patients reaching MMR at some point during the study. This combination therapy may be a promising approach for achieving treatment-free remission in CML-CP.
Objectives Treatment-free remission (TFR) has emerged as a treatment goal in chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP). Attempts to increase proportion of patients achieving TFR include combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and other drugs. Interferon-alpha in addition to TKI has shown promising efficacy but with dose-dependent toxicity and discontinuations. NordCML007 was initiated to study the efficacy and safety of low dose pegylated IFN-alpha (PegIFN-alpha) in combination with dasatinib (DAS) in CML-CP. Methods Forty patients with newly diagnosed CML-CP were given DAS upfront. After month 3 (M3) 15 mu g/wk of PegIFN-alpha was added and increased to 25 mu g/wk from M7 until M15. DAS treatment was continued and adverse events and BCR-ABL1 qRT-PCR values were reported yearly after M24. Results from M1 to M18 have previously been published, and here we present long-term data. Results After 5 years of follow-up, there were no suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions, no increase in serosal effusions, no disease progressions and no CML-related deaths. Rates of MR3.0 (MMR), MR4.0 and MR4.5 were 84.6%, 64.1% and 51.3% respectively at M60, and 95% of patients reached MMR at some point during the study. Conclusion Initial addition of PegIFN-alpha to DAS shows good long-term efficacy without increased toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据