4.6 Review

The metabolic syndrome in pediatrics: do we have a reliable definition? A systematic review

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 185, 期 2, 页码 265-278

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-21-0238

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is currently no universally accepted definition of metabolic syndrome in pediatric populations, with the IDF definition being the most straightforward and easiest to use in clinical practice. Further research is needed to validate new versions of diagnostic criteria for metabolic syndrome.
Objective: Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of cardio-metabolic risk factors associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. In the last two decades, several definitions of metabolic syndrome have been proposed for the pediatric population; all of them agree on the defining components but differ in the suggested criteria for diagnosis. This review aims to analyze the current diagnostic criteria of metabolic syndrome in pediatrics with reference to their feasibility and reliability in clinical practice. Methods: The systematic research was conducted from January 2003 to June 2020 through MEDLINE via PubMed, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases. Results: After the selection phase, a total of 15 studies (182 screened) met the inclusion criteria and are reported in the present review. Twelve studies were cross-sectional, two were longitudinal and one was a consensus report. The sample population consisted of multiethnic group or single ethnic group, including Turkish, European, Asian and Hispanic subjects. Conclusions: To date, there is not a univocal, internationally accepted pediatric definition of metabolic syndrome, which guarantees a high sensitivity and stability of the diagnosis. The definition proposed by IDF results the most straightforward and easy to use in clinical practice, having the unquestionable advantage of requiring measurements quickly accessible in clinical practice, without the adoption of multiple reference tables. Further research is needed to validate a new version of such definition which includes the diagnostic cut-off points recently suggested by published guidelines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据