4.6 Review

Noncommunicable diseases, climate change and iniquities: What COVID-19 has taught us about syndemic

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13682

关键词

climate changes; COVID-19; noncommunicable diseases; pandemic; pollution; resilience; SARS-CoV-2; syndemic; vulnerability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about significant challenges globally, impacting clinical and economic aspects. Research shows that the pandemic interacts with factors such as noncommunicable diseases, climate change, and inequality, making the consequences more complex. Comprehensive policy measures are necessary to protect vulnerable populations from harm.
Background COVID-19 is generating clinical challenges, lifestyle changes, economic consequences. The pandemic imposes to familiarize with concepts as prevention, vulnerability and resilience. Methods We analysed and reviewed the most relevant papers in the MEDLINE database on syndemic, noncommunicable diseases, pandemic, climate changes, pollution, resilience, vulnerability, health costs, COVID-19. Results We discuss that comprehensive strategies must face multifactorial consequences since the pandemic becomes syndemic due to interactions with noncommunicable diseases, climate changes and iniquities. The lockdown experience, on the other hand, demonstrates that it is rapidly possible to reverse epidemiologic trends and to reduce pollution. The worst outcome is evident in eight highly industrialized nations, where 12% of the world population experienced about one-third of all COVID-19-deaths worldwide. Thus, a great economic power has not been fully protective, and a change of policy is obviously needed to avoid irreversible consequences. Conclusions We are accumulating unhealthy populations living in unhealthy environments and generating unhealthy offspring. The winning policy should tackle structural inequities through a syndemic approach, to protect vulnerable populations from present and future harms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据