4.7 Review

Application of artificial intelligence to the electrocardiogram

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 42, 期 46, 页码 4717-+

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab649

关键词

Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Electrocardiograms; Digital health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Artificial intelligence has enhanced the diagnostic abilities of electrocardiograms and clinicians, allowing for screening and prediction of cardiac and non-cardiac diseases through identification of subclinical patterns in large datasets. AI algorithms can detect various heart conditions without the need for hard-coded rules. The use of AI in ECGs has raised challenges in data privacy and requires careful validation in real-world clinical settings.
Artificial intelligence (AI) has given the electrocardiogram (ECG) and clinicians reading them super-human diagnostic abilities. Trained without hard-coded rules by finding often subclinical patterns in huge datasets, AI transforms the ECG, a ubiquitous, non-invasive cardiac test that is integrated into practice workflows, into a screening toot and predictor of cardiac and non-cardiac diseases, often in asymptomatic individuals. This review describes the mathematical background behind supervised AI algorithms, and discusses selected AI ECG cardiac screening algorithms including those for the detection of left ventricular dysfunction, episodic atrial fibrillation from a tracing recorded during normal sinus rhythm, and other structural and valvular diseases. The ability to learn from big data sets, without the need to understand the biological mechanism, has created opportunities for detecting non-cardiac diseases as COVID-19 and introduced challenges with regards to data privacy. Like all medical tests, the AI ECG must be carefully vetted and validated in real-world clinical environments. Finally, with mobile form factors that allow acquisition of medical-grade ECGs from smartphones and wearables, the use of AI may enable massive scalability to democratize healthcare. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据