4.7 Article

Systematic, early rhythm control strategy for atrial fibrillation in patients with or without symptoms: the EAST-AFNET 4 trial

期刊

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
卷 43, 期 12, 页码 1219-1230

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab593

关键词

Atrial fibrillation; Symptoms; Rhythm control; Ablation; Antiarrhythmic drugs; Clinical trial

资金

  1. AFNET
  2. DZHK
  3. EHRA
  4. Deutsche Herzstiftung (DHS)
  5. Abbott Laboratories
  6. Sanofi
  7. European Union BigData@Heart [EU IMI 116074]
  8. British Heart Foundation [FS/13/43/30324, PG/17/30/32961, PG/20/22/35093, AA/18/2/34218]
  9. German Centre for Cardiovascular Research by German Ministry of Education and Research (DZHK e.V) [81Z1710103]
  10. Leducq Foundation
  11. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [648131]
  12. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (AFFECT-EU) [847770]
  13. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK e.V.) [81Z1710103]
  14. German Ministry of Research and Education [BMBF 01ZX1408A]
  15. ERACoSysMed3 [031L0239]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The EAST-AFNET 4 trial showed that early, systematic rhythm control therapy improves clinical outcomes in both symptomatic and asymptomatic atrial fibrillation patients.
Aims Clinical practice guidelines restrict rhythm control therapy to patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The EAST-AFNET 4 trial demonstrated that early, systematic rhythm control improves clinical outcomes compared to symptom-directed rhythm control. Methods and results This prespecified EAST-AFNET 4 analysis compared the effect of early rhythm control therapy in asymptomatic patients (EHRA score I) to symptomatic patients. Primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, stroke, or hospitalization with worsening of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome, analyzed in a timeto-event analysis. At baseline, 801/2633 (30.4%) patients were asymptomatic [mean age 71.3 years, 37.5% women, mean CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc score 3.4, 169/801 (21.1%) heart failure]. Asymptomatic patients randomized to early rhythm control (395/801) received similar rhythm control therapies compared to symptomatic patients [e.g. AF ablation at 24 months: 75/395 (19.0%) in asymptomatic; 176/910 (19.3%) symptomatic patients, P= 0.672]. Anticoagulation and treatment of concomitant cardiovascular conditions was not different between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The primary outcome occurred in 79/395 asymptomatic patients randomized to early rhythm control and in 97/406 patients randomized to usual care (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval [0.6; 1.03]), almost identical to symptomatic patients. At 24 months follow-up, change in symptom status was not different between randomized groups (P = 0.19). Conclusion The clinical benefit of early, systematic rhythm control was not different between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients in EAST-AFNET 4. These results call for a shared decision discussing the benefits of rhythm control therapy in all patients with recently diagnosed AF and concomitant cardiovascular conditions (EAST-AFNET 4; ISRCTN04708680; NCT01288352; EudraCT2010-021258-20). [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据