4.5 Article

Veggie burgers in the EU market: a nutritional challenge?

期刊

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 247, 期 10, 页码 2445-2453

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-021-03808-9

关键词

Burger; Vegan; Vegetarian; Meat; Nutritional labeling; Allergens

资金

  1. CERCA Programme (Generalitat de Catalunya)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that gluten, wheat, and soy were the most common allergens in burgers launched in the EU market in 2020, regardless of their type. Nutritional analysis revealed that veggie burgers had similar energy, fat, and SFA levels to fish- and poultry-based burgers, but lower than red meat burgers. Clear labeling is essential for vegan and vegetarian burgers to help consumers make informed decisions based on the nutritional content.
Nutritional information of burgers launched in the EU market during 2020 was retrieved from their labels. Products were initially classified into four types: i.e., veggie, red meat-, fish- and poultry-based. Gluten, wheat, and soy were the most declared allergens regardless of the burgers type. Veggie burgers showed levels of energy, fat, and saturate fatty acids (SFA) similar to fish- and poultry-based burgers, but lower than red meat burgers. Compared to conventional burgers, veggie had higher amounts of carbohydrates and sugars and a lower content of proteins, but no difference in salt. Due to the high compositional intra-variability in the veggie burgers, vegetarian and vegan burgers were further analyzed separately. Vegan burgers had higher levels of energy, fat, SFA and protein than vegetarian burgers, but lower carbohydrates and sugars. Once again large differences in the nutritional parameters were observed in both vegan and vegetarian burger categories due to the wide range of ingredients and formulations employed in these types of products. A clear and comprehensive informative labeling is especially needed for vegan and vegetarian burgers to allow the consumer to make a rational decision based on the nutritional facts of these products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据