4.5 Article

Analysis of estrogens in milk samples using ionic liquid-modified covalent organic framework and stable isotope labeling technique

期刊

EUROPEAN FOOD RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 247, 期 11, 页码 2729-2738

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00217-021-03830-x

关键词

Covalent organic frameworks; Ionic liquids; Stable isotope labeling; Estrogen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Estrogens in milk samples were extracted using a new IL-modified COF and analyzed by SIL method. The synthesized COF showed high adsorption capacity and effectively minimized matrix effect in the analysis of estrogens.
Estrogens in milk samples were extracted by a new ionic liquid (IL)-modified covalent organic framework (COF), and then analyzed by stable isotope labeling (SIL) method using dansyl chloride (DNS-Cl) and d(6)-dansyl chloride (d(6)-DNS-Cl) as SIL agents. The IL-modified COF (TpPa-Ct@Mi) was synthesized by chemically bonding methylimidazole on to the surface of normal COF to make full use of the high surface area and big conjugated structure of COF, and the abundant charge of IL, which are of crucial importance for adsorption. The synthesized COF can form pi-pi interactions and hydrophobic effect with estrogens, while the IL can form electrostatic interactions with the analytes. It was applied to the dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) of estrogens in milk samples. The extracted estrogen samples were heavy labeled by d(6)-DNS-Cl, and then mixed with the light labeled standard. Samples and standards were mixed and analyzed in a single run, and thus the matrix effect was greatly minimized. The optimized extraction conditions were adsorbent amount, 20 mg; desorption solvent and volume of desorption solvent, 2 mL acetonitrile; NaCl concentration, 0 g/L; sample pH 7. The limits of detection were in the range of 9-13 ng/L, and the limits of quantitation were in the range of 29-40 ng/L. Recoveries and matrix effect were in the range of 89.6-95.5% and 96.1-98.9%, respectively, with relative standard deviations of less than 6.2%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据