4.5 Article

Discrepancies between UICC and AJCC TNM classifications for oral cavity tumors in the 8th editions and following versions

期刊

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
卷 279, 期 1, 页码 527-531

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06964-6

关键词

AJCC; UICC; TNM; Oral cavity; Discrepancies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlighted the discrepancies between UICC and AJCC TNM classifications in oral cavity cancer, with the key update being the introduction of depth of infiltration which is associated with the proximity of the tumor to lymphovascular tissues and nodal metastases. Different versions of the TNM classification can be confusing for the scientific community, and clinicians and researchers are advised to always refer to the latest updates of each classification.
Purpose To underline discrepancies between the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classifications in oral cavity cancer. Methods Comparison between the UICC and AJCC TNM classifications of oral cavity cancer in their 8th editions and following versions. Results The most important update was the introduction of the depth of infiltration (DOI), which reflects the proximity of the tumor to the underlying lymphovascular tissues and was associated to the presence of nodal metastases. Since the first publication of the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual on March 30, 2017, two further versions have been published, while the UICC TNM classification was left unchanged until a document containing modifications to the 8th edition of the UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours was published online on October 6, 2020. Conclusion Different versions of the TNM classification can be confounding for the scientific community. Citing the 8th edition of the UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours or the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual without specifying the precise version used for classification may be insufficient. Clinicians and researchers are invited to always refer to the latest update of each classification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据