4.3 Article

Fluorescence alteration of oil inclusions under ultraviolet irradiation

期刊

EPISODES
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 125-132

出版社

GEOLOGICAL SOC KOREA
DOI: 10.18814/epiiugs/2021/021009

关键词

-

资金

  1. China National Science and Technology Major Project [2016ZX05004-001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41730421]
  3. Major Science and Technology Project of SINOPEC during the 13th Five-Year Plan period [ZDP1705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fluorescence spectra of oil inclusions can be significantly altered by UV irradiation during laboratory process. Therefore, the influence of UV irradiation should be considered when classifying oil inclusions based on fluorescence.
The fluorescence colors of oil inclusions can be influenced by many geological factors including thermal maturity. However, the ultraviolet (UV) irradiation during laboratory process can also induce a significant alteration in fluorescence spectra of oil inclusions, which is seldom considered when using fluorescence to classify oil inclusions. Four oil inclusions from the Maokou Formation in the central Sichuan Basin, China were performed continuous UV irradiation. Their fluorescence spectra were recorded over time. The vapor / liquid phase ratio was measured by a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). The results reveal a generally irreversible alteration of oil inclusion fluorescence spectra. lambda(max) shows long-time stable and instant mutation, whereas QF-535 and Q(650/500) exhibit monotone increasing trend. Recorded. max can represent the original based on spectral shape analysis, however, recorded QF-535 and Q(650/500) require a regression model to predict original values. Besides, there is a potential change in vapor / liquid ratio of oil inclusion after long and intense UV irradiation. The conclusion is that the thermal maturity determination by fluorescence spectra of oil inclusions should be used with care, because the spectra are easily altered during petrography study before being recorded.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据